Updating metadata in a CR2 file

To find images quickly using a disk search tool, like Mac OS X' Spotlight, you can update the metadata of the images. You can for example set the description to "Holiday in Sverdlovsk". Searching for that string in Spotlight will quickly show you all the images.

For JPEG files, you can use for example Adobe Bridge to quickly do this. I assume Lightroom also works.

However, when it comes to RAW files, like NEF and CR2, Bridge adds the metadata in a separate xmp file. When you search for the string using Spotlight, you will find the xmp files but there will be no preview of the image in the search result.

Bridge itself finds the data of course, but you may have moved the files to a computer without Bridge installed.

To update the Description field you can use View NX (free) or Capture NX for Nikon's NEF files. For Canon's CR2 files, however, it seems like it is not that easy.

One solution is to use Aperture.

1. Open the file in Aperture.
2. Click on Metadata and choose the "General" set.
3. Update the field "Caption". That is the field that other applications usually call "Description".
4. Go to File > Export > Master...
5. Enter the data as you want, but make sure the option Include IPTC is set.
6. Save.

You can of course export several images at the same time, and even mix different formats.

There are other solutions than Aperture, I am sure. It should for example be possible to use the utility exiftool which is free. However, Aperture is the most convenient solution I found so far.

Which Nikon camera settings matter when you shoot RAW?

Almost all the settings in a Nikon camera matter when you shoot JPEGs, as a JPEG is supposed to be good enough for immediate use.

When it comes to RAW/NEF files it is a little more complicated. Some settings matter a lot. Some settings do not matter at all. For some settings it really depends. There does not seem to be any exhaustive list of which settings matter and which can be ignored - probably because it is so complicated. The following list is not exhaustive.

Shutter speed is important, as it obviously cannot be changed in software.

Aperture is equally important, as it cannot be changed in software.

ISO is less obvious, but it is also important. ISO is not just a matter of how bright the picture is, but it sets the physical light sensitivity of the sensor. The incoming light is amplified by hardware. When a lot of amplification is needed (high ISO), the system is more likely to introduce noise. Even if my explanation may not be one hundred percent clear, a simple experiment can show that a NEF taken with long shutter speed (much light) and low ISO has less noise than one with short shutter speed (little light) and high ISO.

Long Exposure NR seems to matter. There is no way to undo it even in Nikon software.

White Balance can in theory be ignored, but it is practical to give it a correct value. It is visible to virtually all RAW conversion software, and it can be changed freely in most software. However, some software is unable to correctly adjust bad White Balance, like Picasa or the Finder previews in Mac OS X.

Exposure compensation does not really matter on its own. However, it affects shutter speed and aperture, so it indirectly matters what you set it to.

Active D-lighting is not clear cut. The setting seems to be ignored by Adobe software. At the same time, it cannot be switched off in Capture NX, if you use that software. Anyhow, when you switch it on, it will change images to a somewhat darker exposure by changing shutter speed or aperture, so it indirectly affects the image.

Picture Controls can safely be ignored. They can be changed freely in Capture NX and View NX, and they are not even visible to non-Nikon software like Adobe Camera RAW, Lightroom or Aperture. This is the reason why a black and white NEF file is displayed in colour in Photoshop.

Nikon's Active D-lighting - what is it?

"Nikon has gone through great pains to promote this feature without telling anybody what exactly is going on."

Frans Waterlander

I have no idea who Frans Waterlander is, but I think he was spot on in a discussion forum. This blog post lists some known facts and some important guesses - if you switch Active D-Lighting (ADL) on.

ADL is a technology Nikon uses to handle pictures with big contrast - a lot of light and a lot of darkness in the same photo.

To make it work properly, use Matrix metering.

Switching on matrix metering on a Nikon D300.

ADL is not the same thing as D-lighting. D-lighting does about the same thing - it reduces shadows and highlight, but it is made after the picture is taken. Active D-lighting is made while the picture is being taken.

How it is done, no one seems to know. One theory is that it is done by the camera sensor itself. Another is that it is a setting applied to the RAW camera data.

You cannot change the level of ADL in Capture NX or View NX. Normal D-lighting can be changed in those products.

It is rumoured that ADL does not work when you take pictures in Manual mode in the camera.

When you use ADL in A, P or S mode, it makes the general exposure slightly darker.

From experiments it seems like Adobe products ignore ADL in NEF files completely. In other words: if you shoot RAW and use Adobe products like Lightroom or Photoshop, Active D-lighting will serve no purpose.

Normal D-lighting can be applied in the retouch area of the camera in many models. It can also be applied in Capture NX and View NX.

My own strategy currently is to switch ADL off. It is complicated to handle, it takes time to switch on and off, there is a risk factor that you do something wrong, and life is too short to learn all the aspects. If there are high contrast images to take, they can often be handled by post processing anyhow.

What use is View NX?

View NX is a free picture browser from Nikon. You can use it to view NEF, JPEG and TIFF files, and you can make "Quick Adjustments" to the files, like changing white balance or exposure. You can also convert NEF files to JPEG or TIFF. If you want to make more than just simple adjustments, it is better to use a more advanced tool like Capture NX or Adobe Camera Raw, but they cost money.

One "problem" with the adjustments you make to NEF files in View NX is that they are not visible in non-Nikon products. You cannot see the modifications in Adobe products or Picasa or UFRaw for example. This is actually perfectly normal. You cannot see Adobe modifications in non-Adobe products either usually.

One more thing you can do with View NX is to upload your pictures to Mypicturetown, Nikon's web sharing site.

Adobe Camera Raw "Batch conversion" of White Balance

... or other settings.

I took a number of pictures today with my Nikon D5000 with the White Balance set to "incandescent", which was silly, because all of them were taken outside on a sunny day. As I had taken only NEF pictures, I was not too concerned. I know that one easily can adjust white balance in RAW files. The only question was how.

My first attempt was using View NX. I highlighted all the pictures in the browser, clicked on "Quick Adjustments" and chose the white balance "Calculate Automatically". I then sat back with a good book and waited while View NX updated all the files. There was a progress indicator in the lower right corner, so I could see approximately how thick a book I could read. Somewhere along the line I also clicked on the Save button, when View NX prompted me to do so.

The "problem" was that View NX did not update the original setting in the NEF files, and Adobe products only read the original setting. In other words, even though they looked fine in View NX, they still looked wrong in Adobe Bridge and Adobe Camera Raw.

So the solution had to be within the Adobe products themselves:

1. Double click on the first image in Adobe Bridge, to open Adobe Camera Raw.
2. Select the White Balance you want (for example Auto or Daylight).
3. Click on Done, to close ACR.
4. In Adobe Bridge, right click on the image and select Develop Settings > Copy Settings in the pop-up menu.
5. Select all the other images.
6. Right click on them and select Develop Settings > Paste Settings.
7. In the dialogue you get, choose which settings you want to paste. To get just White Balance, you can select the Subset White Balance.
8. Click on OK.

Once ACR has finished processing the files, they will look fine in Adobe products.

View NX is working with Snow Leopard - finally

The below text is now luckily obsolete. After almost half a year, Nikon finally fixed their applications so they can run with Snow Leopard.

If you launch ViewNX 1.4 under Mac OS X 10.6 (Snow Leopard), all text labels may be replaced by strange strings like IDS_MENU_FILE and a lot of other strings beginning with IDS. There are apparently problems with Capture NX 2 as well.

Your system is fine. The problem is with the software itself, and we have to wait for an update from Nikon.

There is a web page from Nikon that clarifies the situation. It is not very flattering for Nikon.

The page explains what Nikon planned to start with. Capture NX 1 is not part of the software that was supposed to work, and they will not do anything to make it work in the future. Nikon has pretty much abandoned Capture NX 1, so those of us who buy new cameras, like the D5000, have to upgrade to Capture NX 2, which does not work with Snow Leopard, which... Well, the situation is not ideal.

Using "hidden" NEF data in Photoshop or Aperture

If you shoot raw nef files with your Nikon camera, you may have camera settings that are not readable by non-Nikon applications. One of the most striking ones is if you choose to set the picture controls to create a black-and-white picture. When you open that nef file in Photoshop or Aperture, for example, the colour will come back.

To see this kind of information in non-Nikon applications, you will have to convert the files in a Nikon application. You can for example batch process all your nef files to jpeg or tiff format using View NX (menu File > Convert Files...) or Capture NX (menu item Batch). Then import the tiff files to the other application.

But don't forget that conversion from nef to both jpeg and tiff will lose some data. Tiff is a lossless format, but the only thing that is lossless is what is visible. In the nef file you can always go back and change the picture controls to some other setting. However, there is no way you can get the colour back in a black-and-white tiff file. In other words, it is always good to keep the nef as backup, in case you need to make some other modifications.

Index of NEF files with keywords

There are plenty of good reasons to use RAW file format instead of jpeg. However certain things get trickier. One of them is keywords.

The great thing with metadata like keywords and IPTC fields is that you quickly can search your entire harddisk for files about a certain subject, taken at a specific location or by a specific photographer. You just have to make sure that the information is stored in your files.

That is fairly easy with JPEG files. You update the metadata with, for example, Bridge, and the files can be searched in Bridge itself, in Aperture or Spotlight.

However, if you update NEF files or other RAW files using Bridge, the data is not stored in the files themselves, but in the associated xmp files. This means that for example Spotlight does not find the image, but just the xmp file. Neither does Aperture see the field, if the file is imported to Aperture.

The only way I found to make sure that they keywords are found by both Bridge, Spotlight and Aperture, is to use Nikon's free application View NX to set the metadata.

This is a funny roundabout way of doing things as View NX itself does not have any search engine. In other words: you need to use one tool to set the metadata, and another to look for it. Well, that is how things work today anyhow.

What a NEF contains

As a raw nef file is a dump of camera information and not an actual image, it is very different how the nef file is displayed in different applications.

Let's for example assume that you take a black-and-white picture with your Nikon. FastStone, IrfanView and xnview all display the image as black-and-white. However, the gimp, Picasa, Aperture 2.1 and Mac OS X' Preview ignore the tag that says that the image should be black-and-white, so they display the image in colour.

Nikon's Capture NX keeps the camera information, so it appears black-and-white, but one can also go back to the original colours.

1. Go to Base Adjustments > Camera Adjustments > Picture Control.
2. In the dialogue that comes up, change "Non-Picture Control" to "Picture control".
3. Change the settings to what you prefer.

Sometimes it is not obvious to see what changes have taken place in the camera. I for example had a picture where the White Balance was far off. There is no indication in the adjustment panel of Capture NX, that the White Balance had an unusual setting in the camera, so I had to look around for some time, before I found where it was.

White balance is, by the way, one camera setting that Aperture takes into account.

This may appear confusing for a simple reason: it is confusing. Not only are the names for the features sometimes confusing, but the concept itself is confusing.

There are a couple of metaphors one can use.

Think of the raw data from the camera as a Word document. If you switch on Track Changes in Word (or Record Changes in OpenOffice) you can make as much modifications you want. Add text. Remove formatting. Change pictures. You can always select Reject All Changes to go back to the original. You can also reject some changes and keep others. In the same way, you can always go back to the original camera raw data in a nef file, no matter how many changes you have made. You can also revert some changes, even if they were made in the camera, but keep others.

A more real life metaphor is a dinner table. Let's say you change the tablecloth every day. You use different kinds of china and put different dishes on the table every day, so it looks very different from one day to the next. No matter what things you add, you can always remove them at the end of the day. What you are left with is the original naked wooden table. In the same way, you can add effects to a nef file - sharpening, blur, white balance, noise reduction. But at the end of the day, you can remove them all, and what you are left with is the original camera raw data.

Many applications open nef files, but they almost never save to nef format. If you make a modification, you will have to save the image as tiff, jpeg or some other more mainstream format.

Capture NX is an exception, as it saves the modifications in the nef file itself. However, it does not touch the actual raw data in the nef file.

Some of the data that can be stored in a nef without touching the actual raw data.